Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Nerman Fatic vs Kyrian Jacquet

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket is effectively pricing this Roland Garros qualifier as already decided, with the contract sitting at 0% YES for Nerman Fatic and, by implication, almost entirely on Kyrian Jacquet. For anyone holding the USDC-settled conditional tokens on Polygon, that means the market is treating a Fatic advance as a very low-probability outcome unless there is a clear correction to the live event status. The practical question is not whether the players are in the draw, but whether the match is actually played and completed within the settlement window.

The historical frame is straightforward: Fatic and Jacquet have met before, and the available head-to-head record shows Fatic leading 1-0 in matches and 2-0 in sets. That prior result is not enough to outweigh the broader market signal, but it does explain why a zero-priced outcome can still be vulnerable to any late information around the match format, retirement rules, or scoreline if the event goes incomplete. Comparable tennis markets often swing on completion status rather than pre-match form, especially in qualifying rounds where scheduling is tighter and withdrawals are more common.

The main catalysts are administrative rather than tactical: official Roland Garros scheduling, any walkover or delay notice, and live match completion. Flashscore and ATP listings indicated the fixture was due on 20 May, while ESPN’s player page also listed Jacquet for the second qualifying round against Fatic. Traders should watch for confirmation that the match started, because the market’s 50-50 clause applies if it is not played at all, or if it is delayed beyond seven days without a winner. Once the match begins, settlement will depend on who advances, not who leads at any intermediate stage.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Nerman Fatic vs Kyrian Jacquet on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.