LoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket has this JD Gaming v Anyone’s Legend contract at 0% YES, so the market is effectively pricing no chance of a JDG win in the upper bracket final. On Polymarket, that means USDC locked into conditional tokens on Polygon will only settle to the named winner if the BO5 is completed with a clear result before the expiry rules bite; otherwise, the contract can fall back to the market’s 50-50 resolution provisions if it is cancelled, tied, or drifts beyond the stated delay window.

Recent comparable results point to a more nuanced read than the current price implies. Liquipedia’s China qualifier page shows JD Gaming already beat Bilibili Gaming in this stage, while a recent RFT.GG listing records JD Gaming losing 0-2 to Anyone’s Legend on 10 April 2026 and beating them 3-2 in February. That split head-to-head profile matters because BO5s reduce variance versus single maps, but it also shows these teams have traded wins in the same split. BO3.gg currently lists the matchup as a BO5 and shows JD Gaming as the shorter side in conventional odds, which sits awkwardly with the 0% YES print on Polymarket.

The main catalysts are mechanical rather than speculative: whether the match starts on time, whether the bracket and broadcast schedule hold, and whether any rescheduling pushes it past the settlement window. JD Gaming and Anyone’s Legend are both already on the public bracket pages for the Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2, and BO3.gg’s live match page indicates the fixture is set for 21 May. Traders should watch for official series start confirmation, map completion, and any bracket changes from Liquipedia or the event pages, because once the match begins but is not completed, the resolution still depends on the eventual winner rather than the pre-match price.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews LoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO5) - Esports World Cup China Qualifier Phase 2 across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.