Counter-Strike: TYLOO vs paiN (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group A

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Polymarket’s contract on TYLOO to beat paiN in this CS Asia Championships group-stage lower-bracket semi is sitting at 0% YES, so the market is effectively pricing no affirmative outcome yet. On Polymarket, the result settles through USDC on Polygon, with the contract paying out via conditional tokens once the match is officially resolved. The listed match is a best-of-three, and the current zero price usually means either the market is not yet live in a tradable sense or liquidity is absent rather than a firm view that TYLOO cannot win.

For context, the broader match data points slightly towards paiN: Dust2.us lists paiN at world rank 20 and TYLOO at 31, while recent head-to-head history also leans to paiN, who beat TYLOO 2-1 at BLAST Rivals: Fall 2025 according to Profilerr. That said, TYLOO are at least active in the event and not a new qualifier out of nowhere; Liquipedia shows they played multiple matches around 13-16 May, so traders should treat current form and map veto dynamics as the main variables rather than ranking alone. In a BO3, underdog chances can move quickly if the first veto lands on a comfort map.

The immediate catalyst to watch is whether the scheduled CS Asia Championships fixture actually starts on time and with the announced bracket state intact. Coverage from YouTube listings and match pages suggests the event is in Shanghai and the TYLOO/paiN meeting is part of the elimination stage, but the market can still settle to 50-50 if the match is cancelled, delayed beyond seven days, or otherwise never produces a winner. Traders should watch official event communications, live bracket updates, and any change to the map pool or start time, because a reschedule or forfeit changes the token outcome more than pre-match team news does.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Counter-Strike: TYLOO vs paiN (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group A across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.